Dendrochronology cross dating

Rated 4.6/5 based on 991 customer reviews

The relevant dates include the global flood which was around 2300 BC, and the seven day creation week with the inclusion of trees that happened around 4004 BC.

The global flood was so complete that no living thing was left, and logically what would follow is the lack of possibility for there to be a tree older than about 2000 years.

Many factors of a tree growth patterns have to be taken into account, however in some cases one factor may be left out as potential data due to isolation of a different factor that requires study.

The four factors taken into account are: The principle of ecological amplitude recognizes the ability for different species of trees to grow in many locations or specialized habitats.

Tree-rings are easy to observe in the cross-section of most sawn tree trunks.

The science being practiced that is causing these apparent old ages for trees that couldn't possibly of existed so long, Kullman's findings present a case that is disputed by Gerald Aardsma who found that trees can produce multiple rings in a wet year.

As well as one of the founders of the modern creation science movement, Walter Lammerts, who documented in the lab that trees can also display extra rings in short drought periods.

These records include evidence for both cataclysmic events and patterns of climate change over time, both at local and regional levels.

Well-known as the most precise dating method, dendrochronology enables us to study different aspects of the past with annual, and sometimes seasonal, precision over time.

Leave a Reply